Archive

January 27, 2026

Browsing

The post Why Is BTC Price Lagging While Gold and Silver Surge? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The BTC price USD trades within a subdued range shows its hard struggle to regain its momentum back, clearly reflecting a broader shift in global risk appetite. Bitcoin still remains structurally intact in longterm, but capital is aggressively flowing into precious metals that are strongly responsible for delaying upside catalysts for BTC price despite clear signs of long-term accumulation.

Liquidity Rotation Explains Why BTC Price Is Lagging

At present, macro liquidity dynamics offer a clearer explanation for Bitcoin’s underperformance than technical weakness. Some market observers highlight that strong Chinese liquidity historically favors GOLD, while periods of expanding U.S. liquidity tend to support BTC crypto. Current conditions, however, continue to tilt toward defensive capital allocation.

Asgeopolitical tensions and economic uncertainty persist, investors are in total risk-off sentiment and avoiding the worst by prioritizing capital preservation. That’s what makes Gold and SILVER strongly favourable, as they are long viewed as traditional stores of value and as a result it has naturally attracted large inflows. Central banks and institutional players have also increased exposure to precious metals, pushing prices toward record levels while risk assets remain sidelined.

Gold and Silver Lead During Defensive Market Phases

In environments dominated by caution, capital rotation typically favors assets perceived as stable and non-correlated. Although Bitcoin often carries the “digital gold” narrative, the market still treats it largely as a risk asset, similar to equities. As a result, shortterm BTC price forecast narratives remain constrained during risk-off cycles.

Historically, precious metals tend to absorb liquidity first when fear spikes. Only after volatility subsides does capital rotate back into higher-beta assets like Bitcoin. That pattern appears intact. For now, the strength in XAU/USD and XAG/USD has delayed meaningful upside for the BTC price chart.

Silver’s Extreme Volatility Highlights Capital Movement

Recent price action in SILVER has underscored the scale of liquidity currently bypassing crypto markets. According to market data, Silver swung nearly $2 trillion in market capitalization within just 24 hours.

Between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM ET, SILVER added approximately $500 billion in market value. That was followed by a $950 billion drawdown by 4:30 PM ET, before rebounding with another $500 billion inflow later in the session.

Such volatility highlights how capital is rapidly rotating within precious metals rather than flowing into BTC crypto during the current defensive phase.

BTC Price Structure Remains Supported by Accumulation

Despite the lagging BTC price USD, on-chain supply data suggests selling pressure remains limited. Wallets holding between 1,000 and 100,000 BTC continue to accumulate at notable levels. Interestingly, even the smallest holders addresses holding 0 to 1 BTC are adding exposure, reinforcing a broader accumulation trend.

Meanwhile, addresses holding 1 to 1,000 BTC appear to be the primary sellers. However, their distribution is being absorbed by both retail participants and larger holders. This pattern often appears during consolidation phases, when price underperforms fundamentals.

From an analytical standpoint, this supply behavior indicates that once capital rotation begins away from precious metals, BTC price may respond rapidly as sidelined demand re-enters the market.

Capital Rotation May Define the Next BTC Price Phase

That said, continued strength in GOLD and SILVER could still pressure BTC price prediction narrative in the near term. If precious metals extend higher, Bitcoin may remain range-bound or experience modest downside without signaling structural weakness.

However, elevated metal prices also increase vulnerability to profit-taking. When that occurs, historical rotation patterns suggest capital tends to migrate toward assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other alt’s. With institutional participation and government-linked accumulation still active, downside risk remains comparatively limited even during consolidation.

President Donald Trump on Thursday filed a $5 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase and its CEO Jamie Dimon, claiming that the bank improperly closed his accounts for political reasons.

‘While we regret President Trump has sued us, we believe the suit has no merit,’ a JPMorgan Chase spokesperson said. ‘We respect the President’s right to sue us and our right to defend ourselves – that’s what courts are for.’

The suit accuses the bank of libel and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It also says the bank and its chief executive violated Florida trade practices laws.

The suit says Trump held ‘several’ accounts at the firm which were closed.

On Feb. 19, 2021, shortly after the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, the bank notified Trump that the accounts would be closed within two months, the suit also says.

The lawsuit adds to a still-growing list of legal efforts from Trump directed at a wide variety of institutions — from media outlets to tech platforms — many of which have resulted in multimillion-dollar settlements. The president’s company, the Trump Organization, sued Capital One Bank last year over allegations of improper account closures. Capital One said at the time that the allegations have no merit.

Dimon, as head of JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s largest bank, is among the most influential people in the business world and someone who has been courted for years by Republicans and Democrats. In the run-up to the 2024 election, Trump falsely claimed that Dimon had endorsed him.

Dimon has at times been critical of some Trump policies — most notably inflation — while supportive of others, including efforts to streamline the U.S. government.

On Wednesday, Dimon criticized the Trump administration over its immigration policies.

‘I don’t like what I’m seeing,’ Dimon told attendees at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Dimon also said that while he doesn’t agree with everything the administration does, he does agree with some of its economic policies.

On Saturday, Trump threatened the lawsuit in a Truth Social post. Over the weekend, JPMorgan Chase said it appreciated ‘that this administration has moved to address political debanking and we support those efforts.’

Almost exactly one year ago, Trump used an address at the World Economic Forum to take a shot at JPMorgan and its competitor, Bank of America.

‘I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business,’ Trump said.

“You and Jamie and everybody, I hope you’re going to open your banks to conservatives because what you’re doing is wrong,” Trump said.

Bank of America said that it serves over 70 million consumers and does not close accounts for political reasons. JPMorgan says that it also serves tens of millions of accounts and likewise does not close accounts on political grounds.

In an expletive-laden interview with CNBC last year, Trump vented his frustrations at big banks that close accounts for legal and regulatory reasons.

‘I had JPMorgan Chase — I had hundreds of millions of dollars in cash,’ Trump told the cable network on Aug. 5. ‘I was loaded up with cash, and they told me, ‘I’m sorry, sir, we can’t have you.”

Trump says he was informed he had 20 days to move his assets out of the bank. ‘I said, ‘You got to be kidding. I’ve been with you for 35, 40 years,” the president recounted.

Trump said, ‘then what happens is I call a Bank of America.’

‘And they have zero interest,’ he said. CEO Brian Moynihan ‘was kissing my a– when I was president, and when I called him after I was president to deposit a billion dollars plus and a lot of other things … and he said, ‘we can’t do it.”

The JPMorgan Chase spokesperson said Thursday that the bank ‘does not not close accounts for political or religious reasons. We do close accounts because they create legal or regulatory risk for the company.’

Trump was indicted multiple times after his first term in office. In 2024, he was indicted on charges that he conspired to defraud the United States, conspiracy to to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights.

In recent years, banks have faced intense pressure from conservatives leveling ‘debanking’ claims against them. However, banks and their lobbying groups have long maintained that they do not close accounts for political or religious reasons, but they close accounts based primarily on legal or regulatory grounds.

Trump’s administration has sought to ease those regulations in order to make it harder for a bank to close a customer’s account. In August, Trump signed an executive order which sought to end ‘politicized or unlawful debanking activities.’

In September, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, one of the top banking regulators, began a review of banking rules to ‘depoliticize the banking system.’

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Boeing reported fourth-quarter revenue ahead of Wall Street expectations.

The company posted revenue of $23.95 billion in the final three months of 2025, up 57% from the same period a year earlier and above analysts’ expectations of $22.6 billion, according to estimates compiled by LSEG.

Strong aeroplane deliveries helped drive the result, with Boeing handing over more aircraft in 2025 than in any year since 2018.

Cash flow for the quarter came in at $400 million, roughly double what Wall Street had anticipated, underscoring improving operational performance as Boeing ramps up production and deliveries.

Chief Executive Kelly Ortberg, who returned from retirement to lead the company in 2024, struck a cautiously optimistic tone in comments to employees.

“At the same time, with progress comes expectations, and our customers and stakeholders are going to expect more from us this year,” Ortberg said. “There’s a lot to be optimistic about” heading into 2026, he added.

Boeing stock was down around 2.5% in early trading on Tuesday.

Boeing shares fell after the planemaker disclosed another accounting charge tied to its KC-46 tanker programme, one of the fixed-price development contracts in its defence division that has been hit by cost overruns in recent years.

The charge, which amounts to nearly $600 million, is a one-time item and reflects additional spending to support higher deliveries to the Pentagon this year, Chief Executive Officer Kelly Ortberg said in comments to CNBC.

Quarterly performance tops expectations

Boeing reported adjusted earnings per share of $9.92 for the quarter.

That figure was boosted by the sale of its Jeppesen aircraft navigation unit and is not directly comparable to analysts’ expectations, which had called for a loss of 39 cents per share.

Excluding that gain, Boeing’s loss per share was deeper than the 46-cent loss forecast by analysts, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Commercial aeroplane revenue exceeded expectations, coming in at $11.38 billion versus a StreetAccount estimate of $10.72 billion.

That marked a nearly 140% increase from a year earlier, reflecting the sharp rebound in deliveries.

Boeing’s defence unit also showed improvement, with revenue rising 37% year over year to $7.42 billion.

Deliveries drive the turnaround

Aircraft deliveries remain the most critical metric for Boeing’s recovery, as customers typically pay the bulk of an aircraft’s price when it is delivered.

The company delivered 600 aeroplanes to customers in 2025, nearly double the number delivered in 2024 and the highest total since 2018.

Last month alone, Boeing handed over 63 jetliners, including 44 of its bestselling 737 Max aircraft, the company said earlier this month.

Ortberg and other executives have signalled that further production increases are expected in the coming months, though they have cautioned that regulatory approvals and supply chain stability remain key constraints.

The delivery ramp-up marks a crucial inflection point for Boeing after years of cash burn.

The company has burned through roughly $40 billion from the first quarter of 2019—when the second of two fatal crashes involving the 737 Max plunged the company into crisis—through the third quarter of 2025.

That period also included the Covid-19 pandemic, lingering supply chain and labour shortages, and a series of manufacturing and quality issues that weighed heavily on output.

Competition and long-term demand

While Boeing’s recovery is gaining momentum, Airbus continues to lead in overall deliveries.

The European manufacturer delivered 793 aircraft in 2025, compared with Boeing’s 600, though Airbus’s total remained below its 2019 record of 863 planes.

Boeing, however, outpaced Airbus in new orders last year. The US manufacturer recorded 1,173 net orders in 2025, compared with Airbus’s 889.

Airlines are increasingly looking beyond the current decade, securing delivery slots into the 2030s as they plan fleet growth and replace older, less fuel-efficient aircraft.

Boeing counts Alaska Airlines and Delta Air Lines among customers that have placed orders in recent weeks for deliveries scheduled well into the next decade.

The post Boeing stock slips around 2% after earnings: what happened? appeared first on Invezz