Synopsys (NASDAQ: SNPS) is in focus this morning following reports that activist investor Elliott Investment Management has built a multi-billion-dollar stake in the silicon design specialist.

Elliott plans on driving operational improvements at SNPS that it believes could position the firm to fully capture the rising artificial intelligence (AI) demand.

Despite today’s gains, Synopsys stock remains down nearly 18% versus its year-to-date high.  

Does Elliott stake warrants buying Synopsys stock?

The investment by Elliott Investment Management is seen as a positive signal for Synopsys shares, given the firm’s track record of targeting companies it believes are undervalued.

Jesse Cohn, a managing partner at Elliott, underscored this view, stating: “As AI drives a step change in chip complexity and capital investment, Synopsys is uniquely positioned to benefit from this growth.”

This suggests Elliott sees the Nasdaq-listed firm as a critical infrastructure provider that hasn’t yet reached the monetisation ceiling.

Elliott’s entry typically signals a push for leaner operations and higher margins.

Cohn emphasised a “clear opportunity” for the multinational’s financial performance to “more fully reflect the value it delivers.”

For shareholders, this usually translates to a rigorous focus on “operation execution, profitability, and monetisation.”

By pushing Synopsys to align internal efficiencies with its overall importance to the semiconductor ecosystem, the activist investor is essentially looking to unlock a higher valuation multiple that the market has, until now, been hesitant to grant.

What else could drive SNPS shares higher in 2026?

Beyond activist pressure, the fundamental bull case for SNPS is anchored by its “essential role” in the artificial intelligence supply chain.

The company provides the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools required to design the world’s most sophisticated chips – a validation of which came in late 2025, when Nvidia purchased about $2 billion worth of Synopsys shares.

CEO Jensen Huang described the partnership as a huge deal aimed at revolutionising engineering through AI-powered simulation.

Meanwhile, SNPS’ financials are firing on all cylinders as well.

Synopsys posted record revenue of $7.05 billion last year, with management calling for a massive jump to about $9.61 billion in 2026 – aided by the integration of its Ansys acquisition.

Another major tailwind is the “memory crunch” that SNPS chief executive Sassine Ghazi expects will persist through the end of next year, forcing chipmakers to rely even more heavily on the firm’s tools to maximise efficiency.

What’s the consensus rating on Synopsys Inc?

Investors may also draw support from continued optimism around structural, AI-driven demand for silicon design, which has kept Wall Street analysts positive on Synopsys over the near term.

At the time of writing, the Sunnyvale-based company carries a “moderate buy” consensus rating, according to Barchart, with an average price target of about $543.

This implies potential upside of more than 22% from current levels.

The post Is Elliott's stake in Synopsys stock your cue to buy? appeared first on Invezz

It’s only March, and investors have already absorbed a hot war in the Middle East, a credit system showing cracks, a brutal tech repricing, and two of the world’s most trusted safe-haven assets selling off in the middle of a crisis.

The market feels chaotic because it genuinely is, and what makes this moment unusual is that the five risks feeding that chaos are not independent.

They are connected, amplifying each other in ways that make the standard playbook harder to trust.

Is the Iran war already priced in?

This is the hardest question for investors today.

The US-Israel strikes on Iran began on February 28.

Within days, Brent crude hit $120 a barrel. Iran’s response — closing the Strait of Hormuz — suspended roughly 20% of global oil and LNG supply overnight.

Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE collectively lost at least 10 million barrels per day of export capacity. That is the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.

Oil has since pulled back to around $108–112, with Trump signalling a desire for a swift end to hostilities and Netanyahu declaring Iran’s nuclear capability destroyed.

But the physical damage to infrastructure doesn’t heal on a diplomatic timeline.

Damaged refineries, blocked shipping lanes, and Qatar’s LNG force majeure could take weeks or months to fully resolve.

Seasoned analysts forecast Brent easing to $70–80 by year-end. Their bull-case is $150. Saudi officials have privately floated $180 if disruptions extend into late April.

The single most important market catalyst available right now is a credible resumption of tanker traffic through the Strait. Everything else is secondary.

The $3-trillion credit system is quietly gating

While oil dominates the headlines, a more structurally dangerous story is unfolding in private credit — and it is getting a fraction of the coverage it deserves.

Blackstone’s flagship credit fund received $3.8 billion in withdrawal requests in a single quarter, forcing executives to inject $400 million of their own capital to meet them.

BlackRock restricted withdrawals on its $26 billion lending fund.

Morgan Stanley received repurchase requests for 10.9% of shares in its largest private income fund. Cliffwater faces requests exceeding 7% of its $33 billion flagship.

These are not isolated incidents because they are the same event happening simultaneously across the industry’s biggest names.

The default rate tells the deeper story. Fitch Ratings puts US private credit defaults at a record 9.2% — more than double the 4.5% rate in publicly traded loans.

UBS estimates that 25–35% of private credit portfolios carry elevated AI disruption risk, concentrated in technology and business services lending.

These are loans made to the exact companies whose revenue models are now being questioned by the rise of AI agents.

JPMorgan has already gone through its financing portfolio name by name, marking down loans with software exposure.

Regional banks carry an estimated $100–150 billion in exposure to the funds now gating withdrawals.

Hedgeye’s best historical analogy is not 2008 but 2001–02 — a crowded credit thesis, built around telecom then and software now, unwinding slowly over two to three years.

Why are SaaS stocks down 20% this year?

The market has stopped rewarding AI ambition and started demanding AI margin — and the gap between the two is punishing.

The S&P 500 Software & Services Index is down 20% year-to-date. Workday is off 39%.

Salesforce has fallen 27%. Oracle is down 20%. NVIDIA is already 11% below its October 2025 highs.

The sell-off reflects a genuine structural question: can AI agents replace enterprise software seats, or will they enhance them?

If an AI agent can handle 80% of a company’s CRM workflows at a fraction of the cost of 200 Salesforce licences, the per-seat model erodes from below.

Not because the software disappears, but because enterprises stop renewing at the same scale.

The Magnificent 7 face a related but distinct problem, which is the capex bill.

Microsoft alone is projected to spend $107 billion on AI infrastructure this fiscal year.

Across the hyperscalers, global AI spending runs at roughly $650 billion annually.

That capital needs to generate measurable margin expansion in the next two to three quarters, not in five years.

The Shiller CAPE ratio sits at around 38x and is in the top 10% of valuations since 1988. The market is priced for near-perfect execution.

Why is Gold falling during a war?

Gold was at $5,000 last week. It is now trading around $4,495, down roughly 10% in days, and down 8.6% since the Iran war began.

This is one of the most counterintuitive market events in years.

The mechanism, however, makes sense.

The Iran war spiked oil, which spiked inflation, which forced the Fed to hold rates at 3.5–3.75% on March 18 with a hawkish signal. Only one cut is projected for all of 2026.

A hawkish Fed strengthens the dollar.

A stronger dollar depresses gold. Simultaneously, investors who rode gold’s extraordinary 65% surge in 2025 are liquidating positions to cover margin calls elsewhere.

The same dynamic is crushing Bitcoin, now trading at $69,000, 45% below its October all-time high of $126,198.

The result is that cash is the only safe haven actually working, for now.

US money market funds just hit a record $8.27 trillion in assets.

Nevertheless, JPMorgan’s year-end gold target remains $6,300. Deutsche Bank holds at $6,000.

Both describe the current weakness as a forced-liquidation event inside a structural bull market and not a verdict on gold’s long-term role.

But for now, the traditional diversification toolkit is misfiring, and the only thing definitively outperforming is sitting in T-bills at 4–5%.

The post Iran war, credit crunch, and AI: inside the global market meltdown appeared first on Invezz

Li Lu may not be a household name for retail investors, but in the halls of Berkshire Hathaway, he is revered.

Born in China and shaped by the 1989 student protests, Lu eventually found his calling at Columbia University after hearing a lecture by Warren Buffett.

His investment firm, Himalaya Capital, now manages $3.5 billion with a concentrated strategy that mirrors the “buy and hold” philosophy of his late mentor, Charlie Munger.

By the end of 2025, a staggering 75% of Lu’s portfolio was anchored in just three powerhouses: Alphabet, Bank of America, and PDD Holdings.

Alphabet Inc: the AI fortress and search dominant

Alphabet stock remains the crown jewel of Lu’s portfolio, representing a massive 44% stake split between Class A and C shares.

While critics once feared that generative AI would erode Google’s search hegemony, the company has proven remarkably resilient.

Recent legal victories against Department of Justice antitrust efforts have cleared significant regulatory clouds, allowing the tech giant to lean into its AI integration.

Beyond search, Alphabet’s ecosystem is diversifying rapidly; YouTube remains a dominant force in digital media, while Waymo leads the nascent autonomous ride-hailing sector.

Trading at roughly 26 times forward earnings, Googles shares offer a rare blend of “Magnificent Seven” growth with a multiple that value investors like Lu still find palatable.

Bank of America: scaling through economic volatility

Representing 16% of Himalaya’s capital, Bank of America serves as Lu’s primary bet on the enduring scale of the US financial system.

Despite recent geopolitical tremors in the Middle East driving energy price spikes, the banking sector has found a tailwind in a steepening yield curve and a shifting regulatory tide.

Investors are particularly optimistic about a ‘deregulation rally” as Federal Reserve officials signal a potential easing of the stringent capital requirements born from the 2008 crisis.

For a titan like Bank of America, lower capital mandates translate directly into higher shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks.

Its massive infrastructure allows it to absorb tech costs that smaller rivals simply can’t, making it a classic “scale play.”

PDD Holdings: a contrarian bet on Chinese e-commerce

The most controversial of Lu’s “Big Three” is PDD Holdings, the parent company of Pinduoduo and the global disruptor Temu.

At 15% of the portfolio, this position highlights Lu’s willingness to go against the grain.

While Chinese stocks have faced a gruelling five-year downturn due to sluggish consumer confidence and fierce margin wars, PDD offers a valuation gap that is hard to ignore.

Trading at a meagre 8 times forward earnings – compared to over 23x for US tech benchmarks – PDD shares are a high-conviction play on an eventual Chinese economic recovery.

For Lu, the risk of regional regulatory complexity is offset by the sheer efficiency and explosive global reach of Temu’s supply chain model.

The post 'Chinese Warren Buffett' has stakes in these 3 stocks: should you buy too? appeared first on Invezz

Super Micro Computer (NASDAQ: SMCI) crashed this morning after federal prosecutors unsealed a bombshell indictment charging a company co-founder and high-ranking employees with a massive scheme to smuggle advanced AI technology to China.

SMCI stock tanked more than 25% in early trading as investors learned that Yih-Shyan “Wally” Liaw – a co-founder – and board member allegedly participated in a backdoor operation to divert $2.5 billion worth of restricted Nvidia-powered servers to Chinese entities.

This legal nightmare follows a string of accounting probes and the high-profile resignation of the company’s auditor, Ernst & Young, late last year.

Versus its February high, Supermicro shares are down some 35% at the time of writing.

Why SMCI stock pullback isn’t a buying opportunity

While the server maker claims it was not a named defendant in the case, the market is voting with its feet, fearing that Nvidia may now be forced to cut off its supply of Blackwell chips to protect its own regulatory standing.

Even if it doesn’t, however, one simple reason to avoid buying this dip in SMCI shares is the fact that this company continues to fall into one controversy after another.

For seasoned investors, this isn’t just bad luck; it’s a systemic red flag.

Wall Street can forgive a bad quarter, but it rarely forgives a persistent lack of internal controls.

The fact that a co-founder – who had already resigned once following a 2018 accounting scandal, only to be rehired in 2022 – is at the center of a federal smuggling investigation suggests a culture of non-compliance.

When a company repeatedly finds itself in the crosshairs of the DOJ or the SEC, the risk of “terminal value” destruction becomes real.

In this case, the controversy threatens the very lifeblood of the business: its partnership with chip giant Nvidia.

Why bottom fish when Nvidia itself is on sale

Value hunters might argue that SMCI stock looks “cheap” at roughly 17x forward earnings, but that argument loses its teeth when you look at the rest of the sector.

Currently, Nvidia itself is trading at a significantly compressed valuation compared to its historical highs, often hovering near similar forward multiples when adjusted for its massive growth rate.

As Alger’s Ankur Crawford recently noted in a CNBC interview, when the market gives you a chance to buy the undisputed king of AI – Nvidia – at a reasonable price, there is no logical reason to “bottom fish” in other names.

Nvidia offers pure-play exposure to the AI revolution without the “baggage” of federal indictments or missing financial audits that remain an overhang on Supermicro stock.

Supermicro shares may just be a value trap

All in all, it’s just not about how fast Super Micro Computer can build a liquid-cooled rack or how much revenue it might generate in 2027.

It’s simply the fact that in a market filled with reliable, high-growth alternatives like Dell or Nvidia, which are also trading at bargains, there’s no reason to take on “controversy risk.”

In investing, your capital is your most precious resource, and tying it up in a company that requires a legal team to explain its quarterly earnings is a recipe for underperformance.

When the dip is caused by a fundamental breakdown in corporate integrity, as in the case of SMCI stock, it’s not an opportunity to buy; it’s often a warning sign to stay away.

The post One simple reason to 'avoid' buying the dip in SMCI stock today appeared first on Invezz

Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is under immense pressure this morning after posting its Q4 earnings that came in short of Street estimates as strategic investments triggered an alarming 66% decline in net income.

Still, experts at First Eagle – a US-based investment firm – recommend long-term investors to load up on BABA on post-earnings weakness as its artificial intelligence (AI) business remains largely underappreciated.

Alibaba stock has been a disappointment for its shareholders this year, losing about 30% since late January as the escalating US-Iran conflict continues to support “risk-off” sentiment.

Alibaba stock offers a massive AI business for free

According to First Eagle, institutions still pigeonhole BABA shares as a legacy e-commerce story.

Calling it a “fundamental miscalculation”, the investment firm said Alibaba’s stock price is almost entirely a reflection of its core retail operations currently – effectively neglecting the massive long-term value of its AI segment.

It sees the setup as highly attractive given the company’s retail business offers a “margin of safety”, while its artificial intelligence unit paves the way for future upside.

In short, the AI business is essentially a “free call option” for long-term investors building a stake in Alibaba Group Holding at current price.

Plus, a 0.85% dividend yield and authorization to repurchase about $19.1 billion worth of its stock through March 2027 means investors will be handsomely rewarded for patience as well.

Alibaba is turning AI demand into real revenue

Alibaba shares are worth owning also because the management looks committed to monetizing the firm’s heavy research and development (R&D) spending.

Reportedly, the NYSE-listed firm is raising prices across parts of its AI business as surging demand for domestic computing power allows it to lean into its market-leader status.  

BABA recently announced plans of raising prices for its proprietary T-Head AI chips, including its high-performance Zhenwu 810E model, by up to 34%.

Moreover, its Cloud Parallel File Storage service – a critical component for data-heavy AI training – will see a 30% increase as well.

These adjustments, effective next month, signal Alibaba Group’s intent to convert its infrastructure dominance into near-term revenue, and position itself as a viable alternative to restricted Western hardware, effectively capturing the “AI premium” in the Chinese market.

How to play BABA shares after Q4 earnings?

Beyond numbers, the “Cloud Intelligence” unit is seeing triple-digit growth in AI-related revenue, a trend likely to accelerate as more enterprises integrate the firm’s “Wukong” agentic AI services.

While the 66% drop in net income looks jarring on paper, it represents a deliberate shift in capital allocation – buying the future rather than propping up the present.

With a massive cash pile, an ongoing $52 billion investment commitment to tech, and a dominant position in the nascent AI agent market, Alibaba is no longer just a digital mall – it’s the backbone of China’s computing future.

At about 25x forward earnings, BABA stock – for those willing to look past the quarter’s volatility – is a high-growth AI giant disguised as a value stock.

The post Alibaba stock hands investors an AI business for free: find out more appeared first on Invezz